A single compromised security camera helped bring down Netflix, Twitter, and Reddit simultaneously. Not through sophisticated hacking—but because it still used the default password "admin." The 2016 Mirai botnet weaponized over 600,000 IoT devices using just 61 common username-password combinations, launching the largest DDoS attacks ever recorded at the time. Six years later in 2026, with over 15 billion connected devices deployed globally—and that number projected to double by 2030—the IoT botnet threat has only intensified. Your smart doorbell, thermostat, or baby monitor could be silently participating in cyberattacks right now, and you'd never know it. Understanding IoT botnets isn't just for security professionals anymore—it's essential for anyone with connected devices on their network.
📊 Key Stat: According to Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 research, 98% of all IoT device traffic is unencrypted, exposing personal and confidential data on the network, and 57% of IoT devices are vulnerable to medium or high-severity attacks.
The Anatomy of an IoT Botnet
IoT botnets function differently from traditional computer-based botnets in several critical ways. Where desktop malware needs to evade antivirus software and sophisticated security measures, IoT botnet malware often finds its targets completely undefended.
The typical infection process begins with automated scanning. Attackers deploy scripts that systematically probe IP addresses looking for devices with exposed Telnet or SSH ports. When a vulnerable device responds, the attacker attempts authentication using lists of default credentials—username/password combinations like admin/admin, root/root, or admin/password that manufacturers ship with devices and users never change.
Once authenticated, the malware downloads itself onto the device, typically a stripped-down executable designed to run on the limited hardware resources of embedded systems. The infected device then continues the scanning process, helping spread the botnet exponentially. Within hours, a newly compromised router can help recruit hundreds of additional devices.
💡 Pro Tip: Change ALL default credentials immediately upon installing any IoT device. Use a password manager to generate and store unique passwords for each device—yes, even your smart light bulbs.
The distributed nature of IoT botnets provides attackers with unique advantages. Unlike traditional botnets where compromised computers might be detected and cleaned, IoT devices often go unnoticed. A compromised security camera continues recording video normally while simultaneously participating in DDoS attacks. A smart thermostat controls temperature as expected while its network bandwidth serves malicious purposes. This stealth makes IoT botnets particularly effective for cybercriminals seeking maximum return on minimal investment.
The Mirai Case Study: A Watershed Moment
The 2016 Mirai botnet attack marked a turning point in how the security community understood IoT threats. Targeting Linux-based IoT devices using a list of just 61 default username/password combinations, Mirai infected over 600,000 devices at its peak.
The attacks launched from this botnet were staggering in scale. In September 2016, Mirai-infected devices overwhelmed the infrastructure of security researcher Brian Krebs's website with traffic exceeding 620 Gbps. Weeks later, the botnet targeted Dyn, a major DNS provider, with attacks reaching 1.2 Tbps—at the time, the largest DDoS attack ever recorded. The Dyn attack effectively took down major platforms including Twitter, Netflix, Reddit, and GitHub for hours.
📊 Key Stat: The Mirai botnet demonstrated that a teenager with basic programming skills could launch attacks powerful enough to disrupt major internet infrastructure—the barrier to entry for devastating cyberattacks had effectively disappeared.
Perhaps most concerning was what happened after the Mirai source code was publicly released. Rather than diminishing the threat, open-sourcing the code sparked a proliferation of Mirai variants. Security researchers have identified dozens of modified versions, each targeting different device types or incorporating new attack methods.
The economic impact of Mirai and its descendants extends into the hundreds of millions of dollars when accounting for service disruption, mitigation costs, and infrastructure damage. Yet the technical barrier to launching similar attacks remains remarkably low, requiring minimal programming knowledge and infrastructure investment—a pattern that mirrors how cybercrime business models have professionalized and scaled.
Why IoT Devices Are So Vulnerable
The security deficiencies in IoT devices stem from several interconnected factors, many rooted in the economics and priorities of device manufacturers.
Cost-Driven Security Trade-offs
IoT devices operate in intensely competitive markets where price often determines success. Manufacturers optimize for low unit costs, which means using inexpensive processors, minimal RAM, and stripped-down operating systems. These constraints leave little room for security features that require computational resources.
⚠️ Common Mistake: Assuming that expensive IoT devices are automatically more secure. Price doesn't correlate with security—even premium brands often ship devices with default credentials and unpatched vulnerabilities.
The profit margins on individual IoT devices are often razor-thin. Investing in security infrastructure—secure development practices, regular firmware updates, vulnerability patching—represents significant ongoing costs that manufacturers struggle to justify when competing on price alone. This creates vulnerabilities similar to those exploited in software supply chain attacks, where security is sacrificed for speed and cost reduction.
The Update Problem
Traditional computers receive regular security updates delivered automatically through established mechanisms. IoT devices present a different challenge. Many lack the infrastructure for over-the-air updates entirely. Those that theoretically support updates often require manual intervention—a user must know to check for updates, navigate confusing interfaces, and troubleshoot failed update processes.
Even when update mechanisms exist, manufacturers frequently abandon support within months or a few years of release. A security camera purchased in 2023 might have received its last security patch in 2024, yet it continues operating—and remaining vulnerable—for years afterward. According to NIST's guidelines on IoT device cybersecurity, no standardized requirement exists for minimum support periods, and consumers have no easy way to determine whether devices they're purchasing will receive ongoing security updates.
Visibility and Awareness Gaps
Perhaps the most fundamental problem is that device owners often don't know what's connected to their networks. Consumer routers rarely provide comprehensive device inventories. IT departments in organizations struggle to maintain accurate asset databases when employees casually add smart devices to corporate networks.
🔑 Key Takeaway: You can't protect what you can't see. IoT device discovery should be the first step in any network security strategy—knowing what's connected is prerequisite to securing it.
This visibility gap means compromised devices go unnoticed. Unlike a compromised laptop where unusual behavior might be obvious, an infected IoT device typically continues its primary function normally while conducting malicious activities in the background. This stealth factor makes IoT botnets particularly attractive for cybercriminals optimizing their return on investment.
Evolution of Attack Techniques
The threat landscape continues to evolve as attackers develop more sophisticated methods for compromising and weaponizing IoT devices. Much like how AI agents are reshaping offensive cybersecurity capabilities, IoT botnet operators are leveraging automation to scale their operations.
Modern botnets increasingly use multiple exploitation vectors. Rather than relying solely on default credentials, they scan for devices vulnerable to specific CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), exploit weak encryption implementations, and use brute-force attacks against devices that have changed default passwords to weak alternatives.
Persistence mechanisms have become more robust. Early IoT malware often disappeared after device reboots, but newer variants write themselves to persistent storage or modify startup configurations to survive power cycles. Some malware even attempts to close security holes after infection, preventing other attackers from compromising "their" bots.
💡 Pro Tip: Regular device reboots no longer clear IoT infections. Modern IoT malware persists across reboots by modifying firmware or startup scripts. Only factory resets (or firmware reflashing) can reliably remove persistent infections.
The capabilities of IoT botnets have expanded beyond simple DDoS attacks. Some variants include:
Cryptocurrency mining: Using infected device processing power to mine coins, though the limited computational power of IoT devices makes this less profitable than targeting traditional computers.
Credential harvesting: Capturing network traffic passing through compromised routers or smart TVs to steal passwords and sensitive data.
Proxy services: Routing malicious traffic through compromised devices to obscure attack origins and evade geo-blocking—a service that cybercriminals monetize through underground markets.
Lateral movement platforms: Using compromised IoT devices as footholds to access other systems on the same network, similar to tactics in supply chain attacks.
Regulatory and Industry Responses
The growing threat of IoT botnets has prompted regulatory action, though implementation remains inconsistent across jurisdictions.
The UK's Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure (PSTI) Act, effective in 2024, established baseline requirements including banning default passwords, requiring vulnerability disclosure processes, and mandating transparency about security support periods. California's IoT security law (SB-327) similarly requires unique passwords and reasonable security features.
Industry groups have proposed voluntary standards, including the IoT Security Foundation's compliance frameworks and the NIST cybersecurity framework adaptations for IoT. However, voluntary standards face adoption challenges when compliance increases costs in price-competitive markets.
Some manufacturers have responded proactively, implementing secure boot processes, hardware-backed encryption, and robust update mechanisms. These security-focused devices typically command premium prices, creating a market where security becomes an optional feature rather than a baseline expectation.
Defensive Strategies
Organizations and individuals can implement several layers of defense to mitigate IoT botnet risks.
Network Segmentation
Isolating IoT devices on separate network segments prevents compromised devices from accessing sensitive systems. Home users can implement guest networks for IoT devices. Enterprises should deploy dedicated IoT VLANs with strict firewall rules controlling allowed communications.
💡 Pro Tip: Place all IoT devices on a dedicated network segment that can access the internet but NOT your main network. A compromised smart bulb shouldn't be able to reach your file server or laptop.
Behavioral Monitoring
Since IoT device behavior is typically predictable, anomalous activity often indicates compromise. Network monitoring tools—including AI-powered threat detection systems—can flag unusual patterns such as:
- Unexpected outbound connections, especially to foreign IP addresses
- Unusual traffic volumes or protocols
- Scanning activity directed at other network devices
- Connections to known command-and-control servers
⚠️ Common Mistake: Assuming IoT devices don't need monitoring because they're "just thermostats" or "just cameras." Every internet-connected device is a potential attack vector and should be monitored.
Configuration Hardening
Basic security hygiene significantly reduces risk:
- Change all default credentials immediately upon device deployment
- Disable unnecessary services, especially remote access protocols like Telnet
- Update firmware to the latest available versions
- Enable encryption for all device communications
- Implement strong authentication mechanisms where supported
According to CISA's IoT security guidance, implementing these basic controls can prevent the vast majority of IoT botnet infections.
Automated Threat Detection
Modern security platforms can identify IoT devices, assess their patch status, and detect compromise indicators automatically. Integration with threat intelligence feeds allows systems to proactively block communications with known malicious infrastructure.
🔑 Key Takeaway: Defense in depth is essential for IoT security. No single control provides complete protection—layer network segmentation, monitoring, hardening, and threat detection for comprehensive defense.
Conclusion
IoT botnets represent one of the most pervasive and scalable threats in modern cybersecurity. With 15 billion connected devices currently deployed—and billions more coming online annually—the potential attack surface continues expanding faster than security measures can address it. The Mirai botnet demonstrated that even unsophisticated attackers can weaponize insecure IoT devices to launch devastating attacks against critical infrastructure.
The path forward requires action across three domains: Manufacturers must embed security into device design rather than treating it as an afterthought. Regulators need harmonized frameworks that establish baseline security requirements without stifling innovation. And consumers—both individual and enterprise—must prioritize security when selecting devices and implement proper network segmentation and monitoring.
The lessons are clear: default credentials are invitations to attackers, visibility gaps enable persistent compromise, and defense requires multiple layers. Organizations leveraging AI-powered threat detection alongside traditional controls stand the best chance of detecting and containing IoT botnet infections before they cause damage.
Your smart home or corporate network likely contains vulnerable devices right now. The question isn't whether to address IoT security—it's whether you'll act before your devices join the next botnet army or after they help take down your infrastructure.
Secure Your IoT Infrastructure Today
Download our free "IoT Security Checklist" for practical steps to audit, segment, and monitor your connected devices. Subscribe to our newsletter for monthly updates on emerging IoT threats and defensive strategies.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: How can I tell if my IoT devices are part of a botnet?
A: Monitor for unusual network activity like unexpected outbound connections, increased bandwidth usage, or connections to unfamiliar IP addresses. IoT devices typically have predictable traffic patterns—deviations often signal compromise. Network monitoring tools or router logs can reveal suspicious behavior. However, many infected devices show no obvious symptoms during normal use.
Q: Will resetting my IoT device to factory settings remove botnet malware?
A: Factory resets remove most IoT malware, but modern variants can persist by modifying firmware or boot configurations. After resetting, immediately change default credentials, apply all available firmware updates, and disable unnecessary services before reconnecting to your network. Some persistent infections require firmware reflashing or device replacement.
Q: Are expensive IoT devices from reputable brands more secure than cheap ones?
A: Not necessarily. Price and brand recognition don't guarantee security. Even premium manufacturers ship devices with default credentials, unpatched vulnerabilities, and abandoned update support. Before purchasing any IoT device, research its security track record, update policy, and whether it supports features like encrypted communication and strong authentication.
Q: Should I disable internet access for IoT devices that don't need it?
A: Absolutely. Many IoT devices function perfectly without internet access—smart light bulbs, thermostats, and local security cameras often only need LAN connectivity. Disabling internet access eliminates the most common botnet command-and-control channels and prevents devices from being recruited into attacks, while still allowing local control through apps or hubs.
Q: What network changes have the biggest impact on IoT security?
A: Network segmentation delivers the greatest security improvement with relatively simple implementation. Create a separate VLAN or guest network for IoT devices isolated from systems containing sensitive data. Configure firewall rules to block IoT-to-LAN traffic while allowing internet access. This single change prevents compromised IoT devices from attacking other network resources.